Table 3 Summary of different surgical procedures used for Sturge-Weber syndrome secondary glaucoma
From: Sturge-Weber syndrome secondary glaucoma: From Pathogenesis to Treatment
Surgery | Author(s) | Number of eyes | Follow-up (months) | Results | Common complications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GT | Yeung et al. [78] | 46 | 12 | Good IOP control in 2% | Hyphema, anterior chamber angle synechiae, etc. |
Trabeculotomy MAT | Wu et al. [81] Hu et al. [84] | 34 13 | 36 54 | Complete (conditional)Â success rate 66.0% (86.6%) Complete (conditional) success rate 76.2% (87.5%) | Hyphema, anterior chamber angle synechiae, etc. |
Trabeculectomy | Sarker et al. [93] | 20 | 22.95 ± 2.87 | Complete (conditional) success rate 70% | Hypotony, subconjunctival fibrosis, filtering bleb failure, choroidal effusion, etc. |
CTT VTT | Senthil et al. [24] Elwehidy et al. [89] | 49 21 | 60 24 | Complete (conditional) success rate 64% (89%) IOP decreased by 57.6% | Hyphema, choroidal effusion, etc. IOP spike, hyphema, etc. |
AGV BVT Molteno tube Ex-Press | Kaushik et al. [92] Budenz et al. [94] Amini et al. [95] Wu et al. [96] | 24 10 9 21 | 25.44 ± 10.44 35 6 36 | Cumulative success rate 75% Good IOP control in all eyes Complete success rate 0% Complete (conditional) success rate 40% (70%) | Hypotony, tube malposition, tube obstruction, tube exposure, corneal decompensation, etc. |
NPDS | Almobarak et al. [98] | 12 | 83.0 ± 74.2 | Cumulative success rate 66.6% | TDW perforation, iris prolapse, choroidal effusion and choroidal detachment, etc. |
CTNS | Huang et al. [99] | 22 | 22.3 ± 4.0 | Complete (conditional) success rate 52.4% (85.7%) | Hyphema, TDW perforation, iris prolapse, choroidal detachment, etc. |
Cyclodestructive procedure | van Emelen et al. [101] | 7 | 48 to 60 | Cumulative success rate 85.7% | Hypotony, conjunctival edema, uveitis, etc. |