Presbyopic correction on the cornea

Table 6 Summary of clinical studies in KAMRA

Study	n	Follow-Up	UDVA	UNVA	DCNVA	CDVA	CNVA	Retreat.	Reversal
Dexl AK et al. [41]	32	2Y	20/16	J3	---	---	---	---	---
Yılmaz et al. [39]	22	4Y	96% > 20/25	96% > J2	---	5% < −2lns	---	---	18%
Dexl AK et al. [42]	24	1Y	20/16 100% > 20/25	J2 92% > J3	---	4% < −2lns	8% < −2lns	0%	0%
Tomita M et al. [43]	64	6M	20/19 86% > 20/25	J2 60% > J2	---	5% < −2lns	2% < −2lns	1%	---
Dexl et al. [44]	24	2Y	20/16	J4	---	4% < −2lns	---	0%	0%
Grand total	166	6M-4Y	20/17 93% > 20/25	J3 73% > J2	---	5% < −2lns	5% < −2lns	1%	6%

UDVA: uncorrected distance visual acuity, UNVA: uncorrected near visual acuity, n: number of patients in the study, DCNVA: distance-corrected near visual acuity, CDVA: corrected distance visual acuity, CNVA: corrected near visual acuity, Retreat.: retreatment rate, M: months, Y: year(s), J: Jaeger scale for near vision, lns: Snellen lines.

ISSN: 2326-0254